Climate Lockdowns Are Coming
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller
Intro
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order."
Mikhail Gorbachev, Former President of the Soviet Union, member of the Club of Rome
Now that the COVID rhetoric has slowed, the social engineers seem to be ramping up a different, and even more destructive rhetoric – climate change.
This is the ultimate boogeyman that they can use to further enslave the masses. It, more than anything else I can think of, barring an (fake) alien invasion, allows them to do just about anything they want.
It’s their end-game in many ways.
Similar to COVID, it can’t really be truly known because the layman can’t validate it. And it’s on such a grand scale that it’s difficult to comprehend. Many will, and do, simply defer to ‘the experts’ that have the hours to study this, fancy letters/credentials after their name, and/or tools to supposedly measure this phenomena.
As I’ve written about before, COVID was a Trojan Horse to unleash a variety of malevolence on the world.
COVID was a precursor
For those that know ‘what’s up’, we realize that COVID wasn’t about a virus. It was about conditioning people into further enslavement, into accepting the jab(s) as the only solution (the final solution?), as well as power and control.
The QR codes
Early on it was thought that COVID was also spread on surfaces, so many businesses began replacing physical menus with QR codes to be scanned with a phone. Nearly three years later and I still see this commonly practiced despite all the evidence to the contrary.
This similarly happened with physical cash and coins. Bogus reports came out early on that it might be transferred via these mediums, so only cards were accepted. Just another step towards the cashless society and CBDCs.
Then talks of a digital vaxx pass on one’s phone was talked about, then implemented in many countries. One led to the other. This then leads to the digital ID the WEF and other stooges want, which will hold all biometric data, driver’s license, etc.
I’ve grown to really hate these QR codes. So much so that I tell businesses my phone’s camera doesn’t work. Most of the time they stash away physical ones anyway. Sometimes I’ll walk out of a café/restaurant if they don’t have a physical version.
That may seem silly unless one realizes the bigger picture. It’s not just about the menu, after all. It feeds into a larger agenda.
In China and other parts of the world they already have a full-fledged system tied into one’s vaxx status and other social credit systems, and they need to scan their QR code containing such information to function in society. Parts of the first-world had this in place for COVID as well.
Flying internationally, while always a pain, became a nightmare due to the regulations. The restrictions were constantly in flux too. But millions and millions used QR codes showing their vaxx status in order to travel. The NHS in England rolled out their iVax digital system to enable this. Other countries had similar systems erected.
Now the masses are conditioned to additional measures – scanning, filling out health forms prior to arrival, etc. - and if they’ll accept that, it’ll be easier to implement new restrictions. More scanning, more personal details shared, just to move freely around the world as sovereign beings.
And the engineers know that people were using fake versions so they’ll have precedent to start five different committees to figure out how to combat loopholes in the digital versions.
The infrastructure was build during COVID. Governments were giving out billions to various pieces of the puzzle with little accountability.
Contact tracing
One goal they have is to limit movement. They want people centralized so they’re easier to control. Self-sufficient homesteaders that barter with their neighbors for products/services they don’t produce themselves are the antithesis of this objective.
The plebs flying around the world, living a lifestyle they think is reserved for them only, is something they hate. The attack on carbon is really for the 99% of us, not for them.
Contact tracing built additional infrastructure to further surveil people. To track them real-time and see exactly what they’re doing, where they’re going, and other behavioral patterns. To need to scan in to enter a grocery store or a coffee shop. To function in society.
In a city full of cameras and data processing infrastructure, it’s much easier to keep tabs on the livestock.
Climate change lockdowns
I read a few articles in 2020 that spoke to “Oh wow look at how Mother Nature is healing as a result of the government lockdowns!” and as I wrote in a recent article, I knew they’d try to play that card in the near-future.
Humanity’s best bud Klaus Schwab and his WEF produced an article in April 2020 explaining how much they loved the lockdowns for the climate. From the article:
Making air quality improvements permanent
China emits over 50% of all the nitrogen dioxide in Asia. Each tonne of NO₂ that isn’t emitted as a result of the pandemic is the equivalent of removing 62 cars per year from the road. So you could estimate that over China, even a moderate 10% reduction in NO₂ emissions is equivalent to taking 48,000 cars off the road. But the 40% drop in NO₂ on 2019 levels for January and February in some areas equates to removing a whopping 192,000 cars.
That’s an indication of what could be achieved permanently for air quality if car use was phased down and replaced with electrically powered mass transit. Electrifying transport in this way, with expanded train lines and more electric cars and charging stations, would slash tail pipe emission of air pollutants such as NO₂.
The article has fancy satellite pictures and other stats that nobody can really validate. The article ends with this message – proving my point that they’re clearly going to use COVID to set a precedent in ‘the fight against climate change’:
Ironically, by shutting down swaths of the global economy, COVID-19 has helped expose another respiratory health crisis. The ensuing lockdowns have shown the improvements to air quality that are possible when emissions are reduced on a global scale.
The pandemic could show us how the future might look with less air pollution, or it may just indicate the scale of the challenge ahead. At the very least, it should challenge governments and businesses to consider how things can be done differently after the pandemic, to hold on to temporary improvements in air quality.
Well, there you go folks. That’s a huge hint of their game plan.
Agenda 2030
A prediction of mine is that the big push over the coming 5-10 years will be all about climate change.
But this agenda isn’t new. I’ve written about its origins before and it all ties back to the Club of Rome’s ‘solution’ over 30 years ago.
What was called Agenda 21 is now referred to as Agenda 2030. The former was the plan for the 21st Century but they’ve expedited their plans it seems, so 2030 is the big target. I’ve written about the significance and omnipresence of the ‘2030’ across all upper echelons of society - read my article about it here.
"The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
Alexander King Co-Founder of the Club of Rome, (premier environmental think-tank and consultants to the United Nations) from his 1991 book The First Global Revolution
Agenda 2030 is essentially what they’re working towards. Getting people into Smart Cities, limiting private property ownership, phasing out existing power sources. Basically environmental totalitarianism.
Here’s a snip from my previous article, but I included several others that hammer on about 2030 as the target.
And here are, in their own words, members of the parasite class speaking on this issue. Heed their words carefully – this is what they’re actively working on and what the whole ‘climate change’ movement is about.
“The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations on the data. We're basing them on the climate models.” - Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.” - Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University
"It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true." - Paul Watson, Co-founder of Greenpeace
"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen." - Sir John Houghton, First chairman of IPCC
"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." - Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment
Phasing out of legacy systems
They also need to reduce, and then eliminate, use of legacy energy systems. They want to transition to solar, wind, battery, and hopefully, nuclear forms.
The problem is that solar and wind are terrible - not only for the environment, ironically, but they’re not very efficient. Nuclear is the best option and I hope the coming years sees a huge increase.
The issue is that supply isn’t anywhere close to match demand. Look at Germany and UK right now, as two examples. This is just going to result in massive shortages and price increases for everyone.
The best answer five years ago, now, and five+ years into the future is nuclear, yet the idiots in charge only want the same tools they’ve been using - battery, solar, and wind.
I recently heard that the Ukraine/Russia conflict is more a war about climate change. About the transition to other forms of fuel. To get the public (mainly Europeans) so fed up with prices that they’ll call for their trusted politicians to help them, who will offer up the Agenda 2030 solution. It’s an interesting theory that I think holds quite a bit of weight.
Tools to implement this agenda
They can’t just make people feel guilty for being too resource intensive. Shame doesn’t work here without various sticks to punish wrong-think. This is where digital IDs, social credit scores, facial recognition, and CBDCs come in.
The carrot will be you can function in society. In theory you’ll be allowed to do various things in society – go to the theater, buy 15% more (real) meat, drive a bit further, etc.
The stick will be the opposite. Using the Internet of Things and other tech such as Starlink, the infrastructure is soon to be here which will tie all of one’s data into a social credit grid. Facial recognition cameras will be utilized more and more in creation of these Smart Cities. They’ll be able to ‘turn off your functionality’ if you go against the State and its edicts. China in large part already does this, and it’s coming to a city near you soon if we just accept it.
Just recently the EU announced a new carbon tax that will directly target individuals. From Timcast,
European Union nations have announced a new direct carbon tax that will impact individuals as the next phase in the continent’s race toward a zero-emission future.
Under the EU Emissions Trading System 2 (ETS2), new “polluter pays” taxes will be imposed on buildings and for transportation fuels as part of a plan to reduce Europe’s greenhouse gases by 55 percent, compared to 1990 levels, by the year 2030.
The carbon tax will impact gas, diesel, and heating fuels, like natural gas, making it more expensive for Europeans to travel and heat their homes.
...
In order to reduce the price shock, EU countries are forming a Social Climate Fund (SCF) to help offset the costs to lower-income households.
“With this agreement on the Social Climate Fund, we are the closest we have ever been to ensuring that the climate transition will be fairer and more socially inclusive,” David Casa, a member of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) said in a statement. “In the pipeline are billions available to member states to invest in the energy needs of millions of households and small businesses. This is positive for our energy needs, for the climate, and for our citizens.”
My emphasis above on the 2030 yet again.
It’s hilarious that they think the solution is more government as well. They’re creating a committee to use as a personal slush fund, all the while energy for regular people will only increase.
This is what the road to socialism and communism looks like. Surface-level talking points about the community’s benefit but will ultimately end up negatively effecting the masses.
15 Minute Cities
Another piece of evidence that they’re using COVID to do all sorts of other things is the idea of the 15 Minute City. This is heavily backed by the WEF, among similar stooges that pop up in all of these ‘sustainability’ initiatives. From a 2021 WEF article,
One of the biggest urban ideas to emerge from the pandemic is the idea of the 15-minute city or 15-minute neighbourhood. Developed by French urbanist Carlos Moreno, 15-minute city refers to a place where all the necessities of daily life – shops, schools, workplaces, doctor’s offices, parks, libraries, restaurants and other amenities – are located in a short 15-minute walk or bike ride from home. In this way, each neighbourhood becomes an ‘isochrone’, an area that can be explored within a given time, giving all residents access to their needs a convenient walk away.
Many cities are already planning around this idea. From Portland to Paris, it’s becoming a reality. The WEF article continues,
Various cities around the world have begun to embrace the 15-minute city approach. For instance, Melbourne is proposing self-contained communities within an 800-meter radius. Portland’s Climate Action Plan calls for more vibrant neighbourhoods in which 90% of the residents can walk or bike to fulfill their daily needs. But the most vocal proponent of the concept remains Paris, where the concept originated. Its mayor Anne Hidalgo has been championing the “ville du quart d’heure” since early 2020, and has embedded it into a broader plan to promote active mobility in lieu of cars: car speed has been limited to 30 kilometers per hours on many streets; automobiles have been banned along the Seine one Sunday each month; and plans to include a biking lane on every street by 2024 are also in the works.
I think riding bicycles is a great idea. Same for walking. Living in Latin America, I walk a lot. I ride bikes sometimes too. Automobiles being banned by useless bureaucrats is different. That’s a level of coercion and force.
Conclusion
To reiterate, the goal is to have as many people as possible in such ‘self-sufficient’ cities. They use colorful words about how they own nothing, and instead rent everything, but are happier than they’ve ever been - in fact the WEF also put out a creepy ad saying exactly that! They’re conditioning people on multiple fronts to achieve this goal.
Those pulling the strings are Malthusians that believe, in the spirit of eugenics just like the Malthusians before them, that they are Gods on earth and need to control everything from the top-down.
They believe that the majority of humans on the planet aren’t needed – ‘useless eaters’. That soon, robots and AI will replace their labor and thus aren’t needed for tax revenue and outputs.
Now they’re pushing for climate change to get what they want.
Will there be ways around this? I think there will always be ingenious ways to circumvent the system – it’ll just come down to knowing the right people, having some funds available to trade/barter with, and knowing a bit about how the system works. Many got around the COVID restrictions by using fake passes and tests. Once this goes digital there will still be ways around it.
I’m curious to see which, if any, politicians really take a stand against this. Will DeSantis or other popular figures on the right really call out Klaus and his ilk? Will Trump? I’m not that hopeful. I think Rand Paul or Thomas Massie might.
I’m also curious to see how the public reacts to all of this - it’ll take a critical mass of people and, unfortunately, government to roll things back. I think most young people believe in man-made climate change and will blindly obey whatever becomes law/mandated/edict. I hope I’m wrong.
And, relatedly, once one really digs into ‘the science’ of climate change, one realizes it’s all a farce. The climate moves in cycles and is heavily influence by the sun. Long before vehicle emissions and industrial production there have been wild variations in the climate. Look up Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles and also the Vostok ice cores to understand this a bit better. The engineers can spin the data any way they want to make it look like the narrative they’re pushing. Don’t be fooled.
Realize the bigger picture that’s in front of you and the evil behind it. As I wrote about in a prior article Stop waiting for a savior to rescue humanity.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing and sharing!
If people would stop getting their news from the MSM, go to alternative websites and do their own research we could counter these evil elites. Thanks for spreading truth through your articles.